Optus fined $100M for ‘appalling’ sales tactics

Please login to bookmark Close

A judge has ordered embattled Optus to pay a $100 million penalty for “extremely serious” and “appalling” contraventions, after the telco admitted that staff pressured customers into buying phones they could not afford.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

ABC hit with $150K penalty for Antoinette Lattouf’s unfair dismissal

Please login to bookmark Close

A judge has ordered the Australian Broadcasting Corporation to pay $150,000 for unfairly dismissing presenter Antoinette Lattouf because of her opposition to the Israeli military campaign in Gaza. 

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Fair Work Commission finds Uber owes lost pay to deactivated driver

Please login to bookmark Close

In a landmark decision, the Full Bench of the Fair Work Commission has awarded lost pay to an Uber driver who was unfairly deactivated from the ridesharing app for two months following a false complaint by passengers who assaulted him.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Finish maker can’t trademark dishwasher tablet shape

Please login to bookmark Close

Finish maker Reckitt Benckiser has lost its bid to trademark the shape of its dishwashing capsule, with a delegate finding it was not a “wholly concocted” shape that can be distinguished from similar products by other brands.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Court calls ASIC out for ‘kitchen sink’ approach to pleadings in Mawhinney case

Please login to bookmark Close

A judge has taken ASIC to task for pleading its remitter case against Mayfair 101 Group director James Mawhinney in minute detail, but has rejected arguments the regulator ran the proceeding in an “oppressive and unmeritorious” way.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

ACCC sues JustAnswer over ‘manipulative’ subscription trap

Please login to bookmark Close

Advice platform JustAnswer is accused of duping customers into signing up for expensive monthly subscriptions by advertising a $2 joining fee, and falsely holding itself out as affiliated with the Fair Work Ombudsman.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?