Most Recent
Construction PRO
BUMA succeeds in $30M dispute over work at Genuity mine
Energy & Natural Resources 2026-01-16 11:27 pm By Andy Sidler

Mining contractor BUMA, which was hired to provide services at the Commodore coal mine in Queensland, has come out on top in a $30 million dispute with the mine’s owner, Genuity.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Construction PRO
Villawood director can’t bring alternative argument in dispute over $295M property
Noel Hutley 2026-01-16 11:56 pm By Cindy Cameronne

A director of developer Villawood has lost his bid to bring an alternative claim in his case against the company’s subsidiary alleging he is entitled to part of a property said to be worth $295 million.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Construction PRO
Liberty not liable for Seymour Whyte’s asbestos removal costs
Construction 2026-01-15 11:10 pm By Christine Caulfield

Insurer Liberty is not on the hook for costs incurred by Seymour Whyte Construction for dealing with asbestos-contaminated soil, but is liable to cover legal fees for advice sought by the company.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Construction PRO
Buildom’s case against TQM over bathroom pods gets thrown out
Construction 2026-01-15 11:44 pm By Christine Caulfield

A court has tossed two cases centred on $5 million worth of pre-fabricated bathroom pods installed in two NSW developments, finding TQM and its related companies, which ordered the pods, did not owe supplier Buildom.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

SBS did not unfairly ax worker over WFH requests, judge finds
Employment 2026-01-14 4:20 pm By Christine Caulfield

A judge has rejected a former SBS employee’s case alleging she was unfairly dismissed due to her need to work from home for medical reasons, finding it was an “inherent requirement” of her role that she come into work.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Silks get 43% pay bump for government work
Business of Law 2026-01-13 11:50 pm By Cindy Cameronne

The Attorney-General has raised the maximum pay rates for barristers doing government work for the first time in 14 years, but the rates still pale in comparison to what counsel can charge private clients.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Full Court finds Marsh didn’t breach Harman obligation in Greensill case
Appeals 2026-01-13 11:03 pm By Cindy Cameronne

Insurer Marsh has successfully appealed a finding that it breached its obligation not to use documents discovered in litigation over the $7 billion collapse of supply chain finance firm Greensill in separate proceedings.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Aristocrat’s trade secrets case against Light & Wonder settles for $190M
Intellectual Property 2026-01-12 4:45 pm By Cindy Cameronne

Gaming company Light & Wonder will pay $190 million to settle Aristocrat’s litigation in Australia and the United States alleging it misappropriated trade secrets in developing two poker machines.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Protesters challenging police powers face Victoria’s summary judgment bid
Public law 2026-01-12 11:13 pm By Cindy Cameronne

Protesters bringing a constitutional challenge over the declaration of the Melbourne CBD as a ‘designated area’ want to join a third person to the case after the police assistant commissioner argued the current applicants have no standing.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Svitzer took adverse action with exec’s ‘snap’ decision to ax port manager: court
Employment 2026-01-12 5:22 pm By Sam Matthews

Marine towage giant Svitzer took adverse action against a port manager who was dismissed in the “snap decision” of an executive irritated by the manager’s lack of excitement when offered a lower-paid role as part of a restructure.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?