Most Recent
Ventia hits back at ACCC price-fixing case, says Defence called for ‘collective’ talks
Competition & Consumer Protection 2025-05-13 11:19 pm By Sam Matthews

In the ACCC’s price-fixing case, infrastructure services company Ventia has joined with Spotless in arguing the companies were not in competition, and says it was the Department of Defence that arranged for the providers to talk.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Construction PRO
Dyldam hits back at claims it misused $74M from sale of Parramatta property
Construction 2025-05-14 11:37 pm By Cindy Cameronne

Collapsed Sydney developer Dyldam has denied wrongdoing in a lawsuit alleging members of the Fayad family used $74 million in sale proceeds for personal benefit and sought to conceal that fact from business partners.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Johnson Winter Slattery picks up Clayton Utz insolvency partner
Business of Law 2025-05-13 11:58 pm By Julia Kanapathippillai

Johnson Winter Slattery has hired a new partner for the firm’s restructuring and insolvency team.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Class action over risky CFDs wins access to customer screening data
Class Actions 2025-05-12 11:06 pm By Andy Sidler

A class action against CMC Markets has won access to data thought to reveal that approximately 2,500 customers who failed screening tests for risky financial products were nevertheless permitted to trade. 

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Spotless denies ACCC’s price-fixing claims, says Ventia not a competitor
Competition & Consumer Protection 2025-05-06 11:42 pm By Sam Matthews

Downer EDI subsidiary Spotless has rejected allegations it engaged in price-fixing with Ventia on defence contracts, saying the facilities services companies were not in competition with each other.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Construction PRO
The Gosford developer remains locked out of $37M judgment against Chinese builder
Construction 2025-05-06 11:28 pm By Julia Kanapathippillai

A stay of a $37 million 2023 judgment in favour of the company behind an abandoned $185 million development in Gosford NSW against the Australian arm of China’s Shanxi Construction Investment Group has been extended.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Construction PRO
Court approves Sev.en-funded recapitalisation of Callide power station
Construction 2025-04-28 11:17 pm By Andy Sidler

The owner of the Callide power station in Queensland, IG Power, has won court approval for a recapitalisation that will see major shareholder Sev.en inject millions to cover its debts.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

ASIC secures winding up orders against Falcon Capital
ASIC 2025-04-15 2:54 pm By Andy Sidler

ASIC has won winding up orders against investment firm Falcon Capital and its managed investment scheme First Guardian Master Fund, after raising concerns about potential risks to investors. 

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Judge wants more than ‘bland’ claim of defects in Hyundai, Kia class actions
Class Actions 2025-04-10 1:32 pm By Christine Caulfield

Class actions against Hyundai and Kia say they need a third round of document discovery, two years into the cases, but a judge has said the applicants should first detail the alleged engine defects at issue.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

High Court won’t take up Gunns creditor’s fight with liquidators
Restructuring & Insolvency 2025-04-10 11:20 am By Cat Fredenburgh

The High Court won’t hear an appeal by a creditor of collapsed forestry giant Gunns Plantations seeking to toss winding up proceedings brought after it failed to pay back $1.2 million in unfair preferences. 

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?