Most Recent
Increased police search powers in Melbourne CBD justified, court hears
Trials 2026-01-16 11:46 pm By Cindy Cameronne

The declaration of Melbourne’s CBD as a designated area permitting increased police search powers was justified to prevent violence, the Victoria government told a court Friday.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Police search powers a ‘significant’ breach of human rights, trial told
Trials 2026-01-15 11:34 pm By Cindy Cameronne

Protesters challenging Melbourne CBD’s ‘designated area’ status claim enhanced Victoria Police search powers were a “significant” breach of their rights, a court heard on the first day of trial Thursday.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Victoria attacks constitutional challenge to 6-month ‘designated area’ declaration
Human Rights 2026-01-14 11:56 pm By Sam Matthews

A constitutional challenge to the declaration of the Melbourne CBD as a ‘designated area’ has been attacked by the state government as “hypothetical”, but the case is set to move ahead despite an early end to the designation.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Protesters challenging police powers face Victoria’s summary judgment bid
Public law 2026-01-12 11:13 pm By Cindy Cameronne

Protesters bringing a constitutional challenge over the declaration of the Melbourne CBD as a ‘designated area’ want to join a third person to the case after the police assistant commissioner argued the current applicants have no standing.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Court tosses class action’s appeal over public housing demolition
Class Actions 2025-12-22 11:27 pm By Andy Sidler

An appeals court has rejected a class action’s challenge to a finding that Homes Victoria had a legitimate purpose in deciding to demolish and redevelop public housing towers in Melbourne, despite “lamentable” lack of consultation. 

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

University of Sydney staff can’t continue racial discrimination case as class action
Human Rights 2025-11-17 11:42 pm By Cindy Cameronne

University of Sydney staff members who claim a professor unlawfully “named and shamed” them as pro-Israel have lost their bid to continue their racial discrimination case as a class action, while the university has lost a summary dismissal bid in a similar case.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

NSW government fights new direct discrimination claim in child removal class action
Class Actions 2025-11-17 11:57 pm By Cindy Cameronne

The NSW government is fighting a bid to add a direct discrimination claim by the lead applicant in a class action alleging racial discrimination over the placement of children in state care. 

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Trial in pianist’s case against MSO over Gaza remarks stretched to three weeks
Human Rights 2025-11-06 11:49 pm By Christine Caulfield

A judge has lengthened the trial in pianist Jayson Gillham’s case against the Melbourne Symphony Orchestra from five to 15 days, noting the substantial number of witnesses and the reputational consequences of the case. 

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Judge won’t recuse himself from harassment case over GoFundMe
Employment 2025-10-20 11:52 pm By Julia Kanapathippillai

A judge has refused to recuse himself from a sexual harassment case against the Western Australian Department of Justice after counsel for the department donated $500 to a GoFundMe for his brother-in-law.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Full Court revives harassment case, says judge relied on ‘preconceptions’
Appeals 2025-10-17 11:45 pm By Julia Kanapathippillai

An appeals court has overturned the dismissal of a sexual harassment case and ordered a new trial after finding a judge did not consider crucial evidence and relied on “a preconception of how a victim would act”.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?