Most Recent
Spotless denies ACCC’s price-fixing claims, says Ventia not a competitor
Competition & Consumer Protection 2025-05-06 11:42 pm By Sam Matthews

Downer EDI subsidiary Spotless has rejected allegations it engaged in price-fixing with Ventia on defence contracts, saying the facilities services companies were not in competition with each other.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Momofuku restaurant loses challenge to instant Ramen maker’s trade mark
Intellectual Property 2025-05-06 11:19 pm By Sam Matthews

Famed restaurant chain Momofuku has lost its challenge to the ‘Momofuku’ word mark of instant noodle giant Nissin, with IP Australia finding consumers were not likely to be deceived or confused because of the different goods and services provided by the two companies.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Hungry Jack’s pays $150K penalty over Garfield kids meal toy
Competition & Consumer Protection 2025-05-06 11:29 pm By Julia Kanapathippillai

Hungry Jack’s has paid over $150,000 in penalties for allegedly breaking the Australian Consumer Law by failing to comply with button battery standards with its ‘burping Garfield’ kids meal toy.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

ACCC appoints anti-scam czar as new CEO
ACCC 2025-05-05 11:05 pm By Julia Kanapathippillai

Sarah Proudfoot has been appointed as the CEO of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission after leading the commission’s National Anti-Scam Centre.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

ACCC opens inquiry into Lactalis’ bid for Fonterra assets
Competition & Consumer Protection 2025-05-02 11:05 pm By Cat Fredenburgh

The competition regulator has opened an informal review into whether competition issues would arise should French dairy company Lactalis make a play for the assets of New Zealand dairy cooperative Fonterra which are up for sale.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Mayfield’s case over NSW Ports agreements lands at High Court
High Court 2025-05-01 10:38 pm By Cat Fredenburgh

Mayfield Development’s competition case against NSW Ports over agreements to privatise two ports has made it to the High Court, with the developer pressing its argument that derivative Crown immunity did not apply to the port authority.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

King & Wood Mallesons hires merger reform pro from ACCC
ACCC 2025-04-30 11:03 pm By Cat Fredenburgh

King & Wood Mallesons has made a key hire, luring a competition pro who worked on the ACCC’s merger reform team just months before a new mandatory merger review framework is set to take effect.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

ACCC can bring misleading conduct claims against printer supplier
Competition & Consumer Protection 2025-04-29 11:04 pm By Andy Sidler

The ACCC has won court approval to bring claims against two companies in liquidation alleging they  engaged in unconscionable and misleading conduct in the sale of printing cartridges and cleaning chemicals. 

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

ASIC has mixed success in case against family-owned business lender
Financial Services 2025-04-29 11:03 pm By Julia Kanapathippillai

A business lender that issued personal loans is on the hook for unlicensed credit activity, but ASIC’s action against the director has failed, with a judge finding the regulator was “entirely indifferent” to the circumstances of the case.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Judge’s recusal from ASIC case against Sunshine Loans at heart of High Court appeal
Appeals 2025-04-24 11:03 pm By Christine Caulfield

Sunshine Loans wants the High Court to weigh in on an appeals court’s decision that overturned the recusal of a judge from deciding the penalty in ASIC’s case over unauthorised fees.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?