Norton Rose Fulbright must pay $160,000 for ‘intentionally misleading’ ex-partner
Employment 2020-11-16 11:15 pm By Christine Caulfield | Melbourne
Please login to bookmark Close

A former Norton Rose Fulbright partner has won a long-running case over his termination, with a judge ruling the law firm had intentionally misled the lawyer and must pay him $160,000 for its deception.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
Related articles
Ex-Norton Rose partner asks judge to recuse himself from spat with firm
Employment 2018-11-05 11:15 pm By Christine Caulfield
Ex-Norton Rose partner can’t block King & Wood Mallesons from acting for former firm
Appeals 2020-01-07 11:15 pm By Cat Fredenburgh
Third judge in Norton Rose ex-partner dispute refuses to step down amid accusations of ‘absurdly obtuse’ bias
Bernice Ng 2019-08-29 11:15 pm By Amelia Birnie
Ex-Norton Rose partner wins six-month delay of ‘ludicrous’ trial start date
Bernice Ng 2019-09-04 11:15 pm By Amelia Birnie
Norton Rose admits backdating signature on filing, says court OK’d it
Business of Law 2017-11-08 11:15 pm By Christine Caulfield
error: The content is secured.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au