Revelations of fraud this week in the Banksia class action have put the ability of judges to scrutinise litigation funding agreements in the spotlight of a parliamentary class action inquiry, with one MP claiming the judiciary was “stretched beyond capacity”.
ASIC says ‘light touch’ approach to class action funders to end
Mark Elliott was Banksia class action lawyer’s ‘puppet master’, court told
Lawyer Mark Elliott was the “puppet master” behind the Banksia class action, retaning an old school mate to represent the lead applicant but in reality funding and running the proceedings with barristers Norman O’Bryan SC and Michael Symons to line their pockets at the expense of group members, a court has been told.
Dreamworld operator Ardent Leisure pleads guilty over ride deaths
Tile maker Ceramiche wins trade mark fight with Caesarstone after ‘honest use’ ruling
DLA Piper recruits leading restructuring partner for Melbourne office
AMP hit with class action by financial planners
Funder’s fees put in context
The Murray Goulburn class action has been cited repeatedly in the current parliamentary inquiry into class actions and litigation funding. For some, the return generated by Omni Bridgeway, which funded the action, is Exhibit A in the case that litigation funders make too much money. To others – including the one person in the best position to judge – it is nothing of the sort, says Clive Bowman of Omni Bridgeway.