High Court won’t hear East Timor’s request to shut down $328M dispute

Please login to bookmark Close

The High Court will not weigh in on a jurisdictional challenge by the Democratic Republic of East Timor to a lawsuit brought by Australian oil and gas company Lighthouse Corporation over $328 million in alleged losses stemming from a failed fuel supply agreement.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

High Court won’t hear Fortescue challenge to native title ruling

Please login to bookmark Close

The High Court has declined Fortescue Metals’ bid for special leave to appeal a ruling that granted native title to the Yinjibarndi people over a large section of land in the Pilbara region of Western Australia.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Rokt shows innovation in computer tech needed to cross patentability threshold

Please login to bookmark Close

In its recent decision, the Federal Court has confirmed that schemes are not patentable merely because they are “new and ingenious” and are implemented using a computer. While the door is not completely closed on computer implemented schemes, the patentability threshold will never be passed unless there is some innovation in the computer technology, says Jane Owen and Rebecca Currey of Bird & Bird.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Government’s $721M Robodebt refund ignores damages claims, class action lawyer says

Please login to bookmark Close

The Morrison Government will refund Centrelink recipients $721 million in debts paid as part of the controversial Robodebt scheme at the centre of a class action, a move lawyers for the class called an “unprecedented admission”.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

‘A significant imbalance’: Bendigo and Adelaide Bank loan contracts unfair, court finds

Please login to bookmark Close

The Federal Court has granted ASIC a legal win against Bendigo and Adelaide Bank, finding that its small business loan contracts were unfair and created a “significant imbalance” that was likely to detriment customers.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Quintis class action settlement delayed again over $46M insurance question

Please login to bookmark Close

The settlement of two shareholder class actions against sandalwood producer Quintis has been delayed for a second time, as the parties continue to investigate the company’s eleventh-hour revelation that it may have extra insurance, which, according to the lawyers of one class action, could be worth $46 million to group members.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Concrete company files cross claims against structural engineer in Opal Tower melee

Please login to bookmark Close

The prefab concrete company dragged into a class action over the ill-fated Opal Tower has launched its own legal volley against the engineering consultant behind the building design.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Judge awards $253,000 to lead plaintiff in Queensland floods class action

Please login to bookmark Close

The lead plaintiff in the Queensland floods class action has been awarded more than $253,000 in compensation from the state government and two dam operators, which were found to have been jointly liable for damage from the 2011 disaster which destroyed 2,000 homes.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

‘I won’t do it. It’s a lie’: Former GC claims Meriton sacked him for refusing to lie in court

Please login to bookmark Close

The former group general counsel of Meriton is suing the property giant and billionaire real estate developer Harry Triguboff for unfair dismissal, claiming he was fired for refusing to lie to the court.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Down N’ Out to appeal ‘cheeky’ In-N-Out Burger trade mark infringement ruling

Please login to bookmark Close

An Australian burger chain that opened in Sydney as a tribute to the popular American burger franchise In-N-Out is set to appeal a trademark infringement ruling that found its name choice was “deceptively similar” and “cheeky”.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?