Multiplex wants Hastie liquidators to pay up for betting on set-off limitation

Please login to bookmark Close

Multiplex is calling for the liquidators of collapsed engineering services group Hastie to pay its costs, and pay now, for pursuing an action to recover millions of dollars in unpaid bills on the grounds that the construction company was not entitled to offset its debts with amounts owing.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Funder won’t fight court’s power to vary class action commission

Please login to bookmark Close

Whether judges can alter the terms of litigation funding agreements in class actions is a question that will remain unsettled for now, after litigation funder IMF Bentham chose to sidestep a lengthy, costly and risky challenge to the reach of the court’s powers.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Shine Lawyers avoids being dragged into negligence lawsuit

Please login to bookmark Close

A bid to join Shine Lawyers and barrister David Turner to a negligence suit against an Australian law firm retained to assist with a $630,000 contractual dispute has been dismissed after a judge found it was “not just, desirable or convenient” to drag the two parties into the dispute.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

NAB says ‘significant’ penalties loom over money laundering breaches

Please login to bookmark Close

The National Australia Bank faces the prospect of “significant monetary penalties” after self-reporting a potentially large number of money laundering and counter terrorism financing breaches to AUSTRAC and its overseas counterparts.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Chinese co’s $1.5B acquisition of Bellamy’s baby food empire gets the green light

Please login to bookmark Close

The Federal Government has conditionally approved a $1.5 billion acquisition of all shares in baby food and milk formula manufacturer Bellamy’s Australia by a Hong Kong-based dairy firm after finding the transaction was “not contrary to the national interest”.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

ASIC lashes out at criticism over new responsible lending guidelines

Please login to bookmark Close

The corporate regulator has shot back at “exaggerated and inaccurate criticisms” that its updated responsible lending guidelines were to blame for lack of access to credit.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Worrells backs partner targeted by ‘unexpected’ ASIC action

Please login to bookmark Close

Insolvency firm Worrells has come out in support of partner Jason Bettles, who is facing an investigation by the corporate regulator for his work as liquidator of the Members Alliance Group of companies, saying the probe was unexpected.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Caterpillar bares claws over Fiat-Chrysler’s ‘hellcat’ mark

Please login to bookmark Close

Construction equipment manufacturer Caterpillar Inc has lost a challenge to the registration of two ‘Hellcat’ trade marks by FCA Group, producer of well-known auto brands Fiat, Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep and Alfa Romeo.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Key insight into claim on Warranty & Indemnity insurance

Please login to bookmark Close

The Supreme Court of Victoria has considered whether an insured buyer under a warranty and indemnity policy is entitled to indemnity from an insurer when it relied on income and liability warranties in a share sale agreement and those warranties were breached, a case that provides welcome guidance on the contractual interpretation of W&I policies, writes Justin McDonnell and Rebecca LeBherz of King & Wood Mallesons.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

$2.5M break fee in Pacific Energy takeover battle not anti-competitive, panel says

Please login to bookmark Close

The Takeovers Panel has found that while a $2.5 million break fee included in a $470 million takeover offer lobbed during a bidding war for Western Australia power supplier Pacific Energy was not a “common market approach”, it was not anti-competitive or coercive.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?