Bellamy’s has lost its appeals court battle to limit the costs incurred by lawyers jointly running two shareholder class actions against the baby food maker.
Judge OKs $40M Sirtex settlement, rejects ‘race to the bottom’ for funding commissions
Facebook, Instagram were entitled to block Aussie startup’s access, court told
Regeneron steps up opposition to Kymab’s human rat patent
Jack de Belin drops appeal of NRL no-fault stand down rule
Clive Palmer can’t shut down Queensland Nickel liquidation trial
Norwegian shipping company hit with criminal cartel charge
Westpac lightens class action load with $23.25M in payouts
IP Australia stubs out British American opposition to Philip Morris cigarette pack patent
You can’t have your contract and eat it: electing not to terminate
A party to a contract may be precluded from enforcing a contractual right if it has acted in a way that is clearly inconsistent with that right under the doctrine of election. Recently, the NSW Court of Appeal applied the principles of election to a complex factual scenario and the lesson from the decision is this — if you have a right to terminate a contract, you should expressly communicate your intentions to the other party as soon as possible after the right to terminate enlivens, says McCabe Curwood managing principal Andrew Lacey.