Penfolds maker goes to court over ‘wine in a can’ patents

Please login to bookmark Close

Treasury Wine Estates has gone on the offensive in an intellectual property dispute with Melbourne-based “wine in a can” maker Barokes, launching court proceedings alleging the company’s patents are invalid and claiming it made “unjustified threats” against the Penfolds maker.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Potato wholesaler rejects ACCC’s ‘egregious’ contracts case

Please login to bookmark Close

Australia’s largest potato wholesaler Mitolo Group has hit back at allegations by the ACCC that its contracts with growers were unfair, telling a court the terms were open to negotiation and were necessary to protect the company’s intellectual property.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Myer stayed silent after CEO’s ‘cloud cuckoo land’ forecast, court told

Please login to bookmark Close

Myer had an obligation to correct remarks by former CEO Bernie Brookes in 2014 that the department store expected increased profits the following year, because there was no reasonable basis for the statement, a court heard Wednesday at the start of trial in a shareholder class action alleging the company breached its disclosure obligations to the market.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

High Court won’t hear Prysmian appeal of $3.5M cartel fine

Please login to bookmark Close

The High Court has denied Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi’s bid for special leave to appeal a $3.5 million fine for allegedly engaging in cartel conduct, a victory for the ACCC in its long-running case against the cable maker.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Eclipx may face shareholder class action

Please login to bookmark Close

Eclipx group is looking at a possible shareholder class action following recent drops in its share price after it disclosed that its published profit growth forecasts need to be revised downwards.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Full Court questions restraint against class action lawyers

Please login to bookmark Close

The Full Federal Court expressed doubts Tuesday about an “unusual” and “heavy handed” order restraining lawyers leading the stayed class actions against GetSwift from advising their clients about whether to opt out of the prevailing action.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Westpac dodges ASIC bid for rogue trader chatter

Please login to bookmark Close

The corporate watchdog can’t get its hands on documents detailing Westpac’s disciplinary measures against rogue traders or communications between the employees ahead of a penalty hearing in a case that found the bank attempted to influence the Bank Bill Swap Rate.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Aristocrat mulls misleading conduct case against Ainsworth

Please login to bookmark Close

Gaming giant Aristocrat Technologies is seeking further documents from rival Ainsworth Game Technology to weigh misleading conduct and passing off claims as it mounts a potential copyright and consumer law case.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Viterra wins Cargill sale docs after mid-trial revelation

Please login to bookmark Close

Cargill has been ordered to turn over what it describes as “highly confidential” documents related to the possible sale of its malt business, a new revelation in the complex trial over claims Viterra fraudulently concealed crucial information when it sold malt producer Joe White Maltings to Cargill Australia in 2013 for $420 million.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Competing class action fix divides firms in ALRC submissions

Please login to bookmark Close

The “highly-controversial” battles over multiple class actions against AMP and GetSwift are just two cases in a decades-long history of class action proceedings and should not be the basis of any proposals to fix perceived gaps in courts’ powers, plaintiffs firm Slater & Gordon said Tuesday.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?