‘No flight risk’: ASIC can’t get travel ban on fund manager in probe over $35M

Please login to bookmark Close

Rejecting an urgent travel ban bid by the corporate cop, a court has cleared Melbourne businessman Rashid Alshakshir to fly to Indonesia, saying the evidence did not show he was a flight risk.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

In win for union, court muzzles St Vincent’s talk on bed closures

Please login to bookmark Close

A nurses union has won orders barring St Vincent’s Private from representing to nurses that protected industrial action in relation to the closure of beds at various hospitals is unlawful and unprotected.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Indigenous child removal class actions slam ‘masked’ government files

Please login to bookmark Close

Lawyers representing two class actions against the state of Queensland over alleged unlawful removals of Indigenous children have called on the state to produce unredacted files about the lead applicants.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Citing class action, VCAT rejects MP’s bid for hotel quarantine docs

Please login to bookmark Close

A bid by Victorian Liberal MP David Davis for documents on the state’s hotel quarantine program has largely failed, with a tribunal finding their release could prejudice an ongoing class action.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Macquarie says it could rely on Nuix’s ‘promises’ about $1.8B IPO prospectus

Please login to bookmark Close

Macquarie Capital has hit back at a class action over an alleged misleading prospectus for Nuix’s $1.8 billion IPO, saying it was entitled as underwriter to rely on the software company’s promises.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Dominique Grubisa asks High Court to clarify accessorial liability

Please login to bookmark Close

Wealth guru Dominque Grubisa wants the High Court to overturn a finding that she had actual knowledge her company’s statements were misleading, saying the case raises unresolved questions about accessorial liability.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?