High Court asked to decide if abattoir activists own footage copyright

Please login to bookmark Close

An activist group has asked the High Court to overturn a decision finding it does not own the copyright for grim footage secretly obtained by trespassing at a Victorian slaughterhouse, arguing the case has consequences for press freedoms.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Judge flags possible referral to legal watchdog in EY, Alvarez & Marsal suit

Please login to bookmark Close

A judge has flagged the possibility of referring lawyers acting for Alvarez & Marsal to the legal watchdog after hearing the consultant’s costs of complying with preliminary discovery orders won by Ernst & Young could top $500,000.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Martinus Rail wins fight over $23M payment claim

Please login to bookmark Close

Martinus Rail has won its fight against grain supply chain Co-operative Bulk Handling over a $23 million payment claim for building a rail siding in WA, with a judge finding that the deadline for responding to the claim began running from a Saturday.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Appeals court rejects ‘narrow, technical’ reading of VCAT’s powers

Please login to bookmark Close

A construction company has lost its bid to appeal a VCAT decision determining a $1.4 million dispute against it because of its conduct in the case, with an appeals court rejecting its “narrow and technical” reading of the tribunal’s powers.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Shangri-La director takes aim at funding agreement for cladding suit

Please login to bookmark Close

The director of collapsed builder Shangri-La Construction wants to expand his defence in a suit over allegedly flammable cladding installed in a Melbourne building to argue a funding agreement with an owners corporation was not valid because nearly a quarter of owners abstained or voted against it.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Jabiru can expand case over pulled finance for Australia’s first satellite

Please login to bookmark Close

Defunct telecommunications company Jabiru Satellite can add new claims to its suit against major banks for withdrawing support for Australia’s first satellite, but it can’t put on a case that the lenders were “shadow” directors.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Class action must wait for damages in competition case against Apple, Google

Please login to bookmark Close

A judge has put off deciding what damages group members are owed in two class actions against Apple and Google after finding the tech companies engaged in anti-competitive conduct in the app marketplace.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Mulpha can’t strike out class action over Mulgoa Rise development

Please login to bookmark Close

The developer of a 683-lot project in Glenmore Park, NSW has lost its bid to strike out parts of a class action by owners and investors alleging the land on which the development sits is unsuitable for residential construction.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Former client accuses Shine Lawyers of suing wrong defendant

Please login to bookmark Close

Shine Lawyers has been hit with a negligence suit by a former client who says he lost the chance to recover damages in a personal injury case after the firm sued the wrong party.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?