Russells partner accused of bullying told lawyer she was ‘very negative’

Please login to bookmark Close

Russells has hit back at a former lawyer’s claims that she was bullied by a partner, saying in its defence that the partner told the lawyer she came across as “very negative and unwilling to engage”.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

‘Our integrations are on track’: Class action flags WiseTech response to short seller report

Please login to bookmark Close

A shareholder class action against WiseTech has cited the logistics company’s response to a short seller’s report as proof of its failure to disclose the true performance of businesses purchased during an acquisitions streak. 

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Qube slashes Martinus’ costs in spat over terminal construction

Please login to bookmark Close

Logistics giant Qube has partially prevailed in setting aside amounts Martinus Rail claimed it was owed under a contract for work at an intermodal freight terminal in Moorebank, NSW.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Ex-Bulldogs player must produce messages between solicitor and doctor

Please login to bookmark Close

An NRL player who is suing the Bulldogs for mental harm after he was allegedly forced to wrestle 30 other players as punishment must hand over correspondence between his solicitor and doctor.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

AI pathology invention just administrative tool, not patentable: IP Australia

Please login to bookmark Close

AI tech company Paige can’t patent a tool to provide quality control for analysis of pathology images, with IP Australia finding the invention is merely an “administrative scheme” to automate the role of human pathologists. 

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Ultimate Fighting Championship gym exec not on the hook for $5M judgment

Please login to bookmark Close

The Full Court has found an executive at the company behind the Ultimate Fighting Championship gym franchise should not be on the hook for a $5 million judgment awarded to three franchisees.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?