A Sydney barrister and solicitor have settled a dispute over a $320,000 bill initially estimated to cost $60,000 after an appeals court found two costs agreements were void and held that courts should take a “purposive approach” to the rules governing costs disclosure obligations.
Westpac fights bid to ‘get around’ limitation defence in flex commissions class action
High Court asked to clarify importance of disclosure in patent applications
Sydney Trains underpayments suit mulls class closure as High Court takes up issue
AG can gatekeep insurance providers for NSW lawyers, appeals court finds
‘Poor in the extreme’: Fishing class action slams NSW’s defence
K&L Gates snags real estate partner from HWL Ebsworth
Fortescue denies IP head told Element Zero founder to delete documents
Fortescue has rejected Element Zero’s “implausible” claims that the start-up’s founder was instructed by the mining giant’s IP manager to access and delete certain documents after his resignation, as it defends allegations that search orders it won over the alleged misappropriation of its confidential information were based on weak evidence.