Optus agrees to pay $100M in ACCC case over unconscionable sales tactics

Please login to bookmark Close

Optus has agreed to pay a $100 million penalty in a case brought by the ACCC, admitting the watchdog’s allegations that staff pressured customers into buying phones they couldn’t afford.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

CFMEU challenge to administration fails at High Court

Please login to bookmark Close

The High Court has rebuffed the CFMEU’s constitutional challenge to legislation used to facilitate its takeover by the federal government, rejecting an argument that the laws were enacted with the illegitimate aim of suppressing the union’s political activities.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

GM can’t get indemnity costs through ‘back door’ in car dealer class action

Please login to bookmark Close

A judge has rejected GM’s “back door” bid for indemnity costs from the lead applicant in a failed class action over its decision to retire the Holden brand because each group member had rejected a settlement offer before the case commenced.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Judge warns ACCC’s privilege fight with Mastercard could ‘spiral out of control’

Please login to bookmark Close

A judge has warned that an interlocutory privilege skirmish in the consumer watchdog’s misuse of market power case against Mastercard could “spiral out of control”.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Hastie had no written costs agreement with Hall & Wilcox despite $17.8M bill, court told

Please login to bookmark Close

Contesting $17.8 million in fees billed by law firm Hall & Wilcox, the liquidators of collapsed engineering firm Hastie Group have told a court there was no written costs agreement between the parties. 

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Southbank tower developer loses bid to stay Crown Group’s suit

Please login to bookmark Close

Developer Infinity can’t stay a case by the liquidators of collapsed developer Crown Group seeking to sell the land for their failed joint venture for a luxury residential tower in Melbourne’s Southbank, with a judge finding a dispute resolution clause in their agreement was too vague to be enforceable. 

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Judge questions Sharvain’s bid to delay creditor vote in pursuit of $3M from Roberts Co

Please login to bookmark Close

A judge has raised concerns that if he grants orders sought by the administrators of collapsed builder Sharvain Facades to delay a creditors meeting, it will prioritise the interests of its creditors over those of Roberts Co.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Developer Universal can’t resist payment claim after failure to serve schedule

Please login to bookmark Close

An appeals court has ruled against developer Universal, which resisted a payment claim under the SOP Act, saying it couldn’t raise a defence pointing to the contract after failing to serve a payment schedule.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Liquidator of developer North Shore can’t rescind settlement over ‘uncommercial’ unit sales

Please login to bookmark Close

A judge has found that the former liquidator of developer North Shore did not rely on an appraisal of a residential block in settling a dispute over the alleged uncommercial sale of four units in a Lane Cove development, despite finding it was likely not a genuine document. 

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Off-the-plan buyer of $10.3M Newstead high-rise penthouses wins suit

Please login to bookmark Close

The purported purchaser of two off-the-plan penthouses in a Newstead high-rise has won his suit against the developer, who sold the apartments to someone else for more than double the contract price.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?