Builtcom says court’s ruling ‘disables’ progress payments on Sydney project

Please login to bookmark Close

Challenging an $8.5 million adjudication on a payment claim that sought over $30 million from developer VSD Investments, construction company Builtcom says it is effectively “disabled” from recovery of progress payments.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Legal action filed over Woodside’s North West Shelf extension bid

Please login to bookmark Close

Woodside’s bid to extend its North West Shelf gas project by 40 years faces more resistance after Greenpeace’s challenge was denied, this time through court action seeking protection of culturally significant rock art.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Court tosses Clive Palmer’s expert reports on eve of CITIC trial

Please login to bookmark Close

A judge has found that expert reports submitted by Clive Palmer and his company Mineralogy in a fight against CITIC over royalty payments for the Yabulu Refinery present a “fresh case” and don’t comply with court orders. 

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Austin Engineering needs more evidence for freezing order against ex-sales rep: court

Please login to bookmark Close

A judge has denied Austin Engineering’s bid for a $210,000 freezing order against a former sales representative, with a judge finding there was an arguable claim for breach of confidence but no evidence of a claim to more than nominal damages. 

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Tesa wants Full Court to resolve judicial conflict on apprehension of bias

Please login to bookmark Close

Mining company Tesa Group wants the Full Federal Court to settle a conflict in judicial opinions on whether remarks made in parliament can factor into recusal applications. 

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Bedshed cops $40K in penalties for alleged misleading NDIS claims

Please login to bookmark Close

Bedding and mattress retailer Bedshed has paid nearly $40,000 in penalties after the Australian Competition and Consumer issued it with two infringement notices over advertising that claimed its products were approved by the National Disability insurance Scheme.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?