The corporate regulator is appealing a judgment that tossed its landmark action against Austo & General Insurance, saying the judge erred in construing an unclear and disproportionate term in the insurer’s house and contents policy.
Icon forced into arbitration with ANSTO over $27M waste facility at Lucas Heights
Judge OKs $16M Dixon Advisory class action settlement, awards competing funder a sliver
Lawyer repping Reynolds in case against Higgins cops fine for professional misconduct
NSW court avoids mention of preferred pronouns in latest practice note
After 7 years of litigation, patent for blockbuster sleep drug Circadin found valid
High Court to decide if new duty of care for NSW builders is apportionable
Acciona hit with second suit over $511M waste-to-energy plant
GLAD trash bags maker taken to court by ACCC for ‘50% ocean plastic’ claims
Court’s openness in Lehrmann case shines light on what judges do, and that’s good for judges
Judges experience extreme levels of stress and secondary trauma, exacerbated by public comment that is often ignorant of what the job entails. The transparent approach taken by the judge presiding over the Bruce Lehrmann case may help pave the way to alleviating some of that stress, but more needs to be done, experts say.