The Australian Securities and Investments Commission has dragged lender Money3 to court for allegedly failing to properly assess the creditworthiness of low-income individuals before saddling them with $11,000 loans for second-hand car purchases.
HFW recruits leading IR lawyer to bolster employment practice
Tech exec subjected to DXC’s ‘unreasonable’ 7-year restraint clause wins appeal
‘Silly case’ between class action applicant, funder settles
With no funder, Colonial class action members better off by up to $12M, court finds
UFG to pay $5M for misleading gym franchisees about ‘near valueless’ businesses
Ex-commando slams ABC’s ‘nonsensical’ argument against damages in defamation case
Block’s mobile payment method not patentable, says IP Australia
In decades-long fight over coal seam gas fields, Tri-Star loses referee bid
Are the courts really plagued by duplicative class actions?
A fed-up judge has vented his frustration with the problem of competing class actions in a move that appears to punish the second filed case against Medibank. But is he right that the courts are increasingly being asked to deal with duplicative proceedings? And was his order really all that drastic?