Three decades on from its rocky beginnings, when representatives of the coalition opposition decried the Part IVA bill as a “monstrosity” and as “looney”, “half baked” and “wrong” during parliamentary debates, the class action procedure and its legitimacy and efficacy have come to gain acceptance across the spectrum of practitioners and among the judiciary, says Maurice Blackburn’s Julian Schimmel.
‘Think about whether GC is the right role for you’: Ex-fintech lawyer says she was bullied after maternity leave
Rio Tinto must pay $750,000 for disclosure breaches over $5.8B acquisition
ANZ denies charging retrospective interest on credit cards
More briefs go to female barristers, but fee disparity remains
Telstra hit with class action over COVID-19 vaccination policy
$28M settlement in Arnold Bloch Leibler class action to get court’s OK
Mitsubishi hits back at class action, says it can’t be sued over fuel efficiency labels
After 30 years, class action regime still plagued with uncertainty
Over the last 30 years, the class action regimes have undoubtedly improved access to justice, helped to resolve disputes more efficiently, and reduced the costs of litigation. While the current spotlight on the role of litigation funding and returns to group members is warranted, other aspects of the regimes are ripe for reform, say Clayton Utz partners Greg Williams, Andrew Morrison, Alexandra Rose and senior associate Will Atfield.