Lawyers and experts welcomed the High Court’s ruling Wednesday, which approved a class action beauty parade approach to dealing with competing proceedings and provided guidance as to how judges might otherwise manage the problem of duplicative cases. Here, Lawyerly outlines the important things to take away from the majority’s judgment.
PM says Christian Porter ‘an innocent man under our law’, won’t seek SG’s advice
MinterEllison board asks CEO Annette Kimmitt to step down
Can artificial intelligence be named inventor of a patent? Federal Court to rule
ATO wins High Court appeal against Travelex over mistaken $149,000 tax surplus
Sparke Helmore’s ‘escalating legal costs’ made Nick Scali switch to Allens, court told
ACCC takes swipe at Visa over interchange fees on debit card payments
High Court says ‘no one size fits all’ when it comes to competing class actions
MinterEllison email controversy exposes clash of ethics, legal experts say
As pressure mounts for the board of MinterEllison to remove the law firm’s CEO in response to a staff email apologising for a partner’s representation of the federal attorney general, legal ethics experts told Lawyerly law firms must be free to vet potential clients, and that social issues may in the future play a bigger role in deciding whether to reject matters.