The Commonwealth Bank of Australia has told a judge there’s no chance it will admit to ASIC’s allegations that it accepted conflicted remuneration through the sale of its Essential Super product, likening the matter to ASIC’s failed ‘Wagyu and shiraz’ case against Westpac.
Full Court dashes Bendigo and Adelaide Bank’s hopes of saving ‘community bank’ trade mark
$150M bushfire class action filed against SA Power Networks
Peloton files lawsuit over rival’s ‘spinning’ trade mark ahead of launch in Australia
Katy Perry ‘cannot avoid discovery process’ in trade mark dispute, court told
MinterEllison appoints acting CEO after Kimmitt thanked for service, shown the door
Epic Games brings competition case against Google over in-app purchases
‘Insureds are not only risks; they are people’: Judge slams TAL’s treatment of cancer patient’s claim
5 takeaways from High Court’s ruling on class action beauty parades
Lawyers and experts welcomed the High Court’s ruling Wednesday, which approved a class action beauty parade approach to dealing with competing proceedings and provided guidance as to how judges might otherwise manage the problem of duplicative cases. Here, Lawyerly outlines the important things to take away from the majority’s judgment.