Doctors can’t ‘rewrite history’ as judge puts deep sleep therapy defamation case to bed

Please login to bookmark Close

Two psychiatrists at the heart of the Chelmsford deep sleep therapy scandal have had their defamation cases against publisher HarperCollins dismissed ,with a judge finding the lawsuits were an attempt to “rewrite history” regarding harm done to patients receiving their controversial treatment.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Solicitor fined for ‘extravagant and intemperate attack’ on opposing counsel after 9-year legal battle

Please login to bookmark Close

The director of a Melbourne law firm has been reprimanded and fined $10,000 for sending two letters to opposing counsel accusing him of being dishonest, following a protracted nine-year legal battle.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Late document dump in Banksia class action a ‘professional disgrace’, court told

Please login to bookmark Close

Last-minute discovery of emails by the solicitor facing accusations of complicity in a fraudulent scheme by his father and the barristers leading a class action over the collapse of Banksia Securities has been labelled a “professional disgrace” that has twice delayed his trial.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Banksia class action judge shoots down barrister’s proportionate liability notice

Please login to bookmark Close

The judge overseeing a trial over alleged misconduct by lawyers behind the Banksia class action has blasted a bid by disgraced senior counsel Norman O’Bryan to file a notice of proportionate liability ahead of his turn in the witness stand, saying the notice flew in the face of the barrister’s decision to concede defeat in the case.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

CFMEU liable for officers’ refusal to produce permits, Full Court holds

Please login to bookmark Close

The Full Federal Court has upheld a ruling that the CFMEU was “knowingly concerned” in the refusal of union officers to produce entry permits at a Queensland building site, with the appeals court saying it was”difficult” to understand how the union was not an accessory to the contraventions of its employees.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Clive Palmer’s companies slammed for misleading court in $30B dispute with WA

Please login to bookmark Close

Two companies owned by billionaire Clive Palmer have suffered a legal setback, with a judge setting aside prior orders enforcing two awards in a $30 billion mining dispute with the Western Australian government and criticising the companies for misleading the court.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Former solicitor general to act as contradictor in GetSwift recusal appeal

Please login to bookmark Close

Former solicitor general Justin Gleeson SC has been appointed contradictor in GetSwift’s battle to have the judge overseeing a shareholder class action disqualify himself from the proceedings after overseeing the trial in ASIC’s case against the logistics provider.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Advanta patent lapses after renewal correspondence sent to departed employees

Please login to bookmark Close

Advanta Seeds has been denied more time to pay renewal fees for its patent for a hybrid plant cell after correspondence from its lawyers about the renewal was sent to employees that had left the company and the patent renewal fell through the cracks during a 2016 systems upgrade.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Insurer not on the hook for Opal Tower concrete manufacturer’s legal bills

Please login to bookmark Close

The prefab concrete specialist behind Sydney’s Opal Tower has lost a courtroom bid to have its insurer pay costs in advance incurred in defending cross-claims in two lawsuits over the ill-fated tower.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?