Squire Patton Boggs must pay rival’s fees for fighting GetSwift restraint
Class Actions 2018-07-31 10:19 pm By Christine Caulfield | Melbourne
Please login to bookmark Close

Law firm Squire Patton Boggs is again on the losing end of a ruling by the judge presiding over a shareholder class action against GetSwift, a case now better known for infighting among lawyers than for the allegations levelled against the tech startup.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
Related articles
No holds barred in GetSwift class action challenge
Appeals 2018-07-27 10:19 pm By Christine Caulfield
GetSwift’s defence says Squire Patton Boggs partly liable
Article 2018-07-17 10:19 pm By Christine Caulfield
Squire Patton Boggs loses epic battle over GetSwift client communications
Class Actions 2018-06-25 10:19 pm By Miklos Bolza
Law firm can’t put ‘parasitic’ rival on hook for GetSwift costs
Article 2018-06-15 10:19 pm By Miklos Bolza
GetSwift judge won’t be slowed by class action appeal
Class Actions 2018-06-08 10:19 pm By Miklos Bolza
Corrs Chambers fights ruling that hit pause on GetSwift class action
Appeals 2018-06-07 10:19 pm By Christine Caulfield
Squire Patton Boggs appeals stay of GetSwift class action
Class Actions 2018-06-04 10:19 pm By Christine Caulfield
Judge picks Phi Finney to lead GetSwift shareholder class action
Class Actions 2018-05-23 10:19 pm By Christine Caulfield
error: The content is secured.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au