Most Recent
Construction PRO
AirServices can’t get separate hearing in airport lease fight over PFAS
Real Estate 2025-02-27 11:41 pm By Andy Sidler

A judge has rejected AirServices bid for a separate hearing on whether it was required to manage environmental issues outside of its leased site at the Launceston Airport in Tasmania.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Construction PRO
Pipeline acquired by Conexa in $74.7M deal is taxable ‘land’: appeals court
Justice Anthony Payne 2025-02-27 4:31 pm By Sam Matthews

An appeals court has found water infrastructure investor Conexa liable to pay land duty on a $46 million Sydney pipeline it acquired as part of a blockbuster deal with Rosehill.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Construction PRO
Developers’ email agreement on $1.3M loan not binding: appeals court
Chief Justice Andrew Bell 2025-02-27 11:18 pm By Julia Kanapathippillai

An appeals court has tossed a challenge to a judge’s decision that found a property developer was required to return a $1.3 million loan, despite finding the judge erred in holding enforceable an agreement reached over email.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Construction PRO
One Central Park apartment owners sue Frasers over planter boxes
Construction 2025-02-26 4:16 pm By Cindy Cameronne

Apartment owners at Sydney’s $2 billion One Central Park have sued Frasers Property over 1,750 planter boxes they say are detaching from the two towers and contain combustible material.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Construction PRO
NAB pays $20M to settle class action over Walton Construction collapse
Construction 2025-02-26 11:23 pm By Cat Fredenburgh

NAB has agreed to pay $20 million to settle a class action over the collapse of Melbourne-based builder Walton Construction. 

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Construction PRO
Meriton’s bid for security in $123M defects suit fails
Construction 2025-02-26 10:47 pm By Andy Sidler

A judge has declined Meriton’s bid for $2.4 million in security in a lawsuit over alleged systemic defects at the Alcove apartment development in Sydney’s North Shore.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Construction PRO
End to fights over Callide power station may be in sight, administrators say
Restructuring & Insolvency 2025-02-26 11:08 pm By Cat Fredenburgh

The administrators for the operator of the Callide power station have won extra time to convene a second creditors meeting after the court heard they may soon be able to put to rest a series of complex disputes over the Queensland power station.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Construction PRO
Mulpha’s subcontractors on Mulgoa Rise development may be dragged into case
Article 2025-02-26 11:08 pm By Christine Caulfield

Luxury developer Mulpha says a class action’s negligence allegations over the Mulgoa Rise development in Glenmore Park, NSW might warrant cross-claims against subcontractors.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Construction PRO
HWL Ebsworth, ex-partner lose round in clients’ case over Belmore development
Construction 2025-02-25 4:19 pm By Cindy Cameronne

HWL Ebsworth has lost a discovery spat in a case by clients who allege the firm and one of its former partners are liable for “lost money” in connection with property developer Belmore 88. 

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Construction PRO
NCAT ruling on Raysons defects claim amounted to ‘nonsense’: judge
Construction 2025-02-25 11:56 pm By Andy Sidler

A Meadowbank owners corporation has won an appeal in its fight with builder Raysons over defects, with a judge saying an appeals tribunal failed to correct a decision so “replete with typographical errors” that it amounted to “nonsense”.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?